Original Historical Accounts















The capture of rebel guns at Banbury by Spencer Compton, the Earl of Northampton, on Monday 8th August 1642

Letters written by Sir James Compton following the death of his father, to Prince Rupert and to his widowed mother, in late March 1643

Letter to Prince Rupert following the Earl of Northampton's victory at Middleton Cheney, Saturday 6th May 1643

A duel near Banbury involving an Officer of the Banbury Garrison on Wednesday 31st July 1644

An attempted assault on the besieged Banbury Garrison by rebel troops on Monday 23rd September 1644

The relief of the Siege of Banbury Castle, Friday 25th October 1644, by forces under the Earl of Northampton

An attempt to recapture the Compton family home of Compton Wynyates from rebel occupants on 30th January 1645

An attack on a rebel supply convoy by the Earl of Northampton's Regiment, 6th March 1645

A skirmish at Kingsthorpe near Northampton on Tuesday 18th March 1645, involving the four eldest Compton brothers

A skirmish at Islip near Oxford between Cromwell and the Earl of Northampton, on Thursday 24th April 1645, and the regrouping of the King's forces at Oxford


An account of the capture of rebel guns at Banbury by Spencer Compton, the Earl of Northampton, on Monday 8th August 1642

In July 1642 Parliament granted Lord Brooke, rebel neighbour to the Earl of Northampton, six pieces of ordnance to strengthen Warwick Castle. These were delivered to Colonel John Fiennes, Governor of Banbury (then under Parliament control) on 29th July. Lord Brooke then rode with an escort that night from Warwick to collect them, but a Royalist agent in Lord Brooke's ranks slipped away and returned to Warwick to warn Lord Northampton (who was conducting a recruitment rally in Warwick on 30th July) of Lord Brooke's actions. Lord Northampton took his troops and blocked Lord Brooke's return to Warwick, refusing to allow the guns to be taken any further. After much parleying, Lord Brooke (who was outnumbered) agreed to take the guns back to Banbury, and that neither party must remove them without giving the other three days notice. Lord Brooke then hastily returned to London. A week later Lord Northampton moved against Banbury in order to capture the guns. A rebel scout discovered the Royalists coming down Hardwick Lane to Banbury on Sunday night, 7th August, but because of the extreme dark both sides stood their ground until the following morning. The following account picks up the story:

The town being in a sad case, not knowing how they would deal with them, exposed themselves and town on Munday morning, and...they came in with about 5 or 600 horses, but 300 good ones, and the rest sorry jades, anything [they] could get from the poor countrey men...; and as beggarly riders set on them, though for the present they flourished with money, yet their clothes bewrayed them to be neither gentlemen nor Cavaliers. And having fil'd the town with horses the chief of them came to the Red Lion Inne, and desired to speak with Colonell Feines and Captaine Vivers, who were in the castle, to whom reply was made, they should...: then they produced the Commission of Array, and required them to deliver the Ordnance, otherwise they would take them by force and fire the town, And having obtained what they came for...they clear'd the town againe, and were all departed before night, who carried them to the E. of Northampton's house [Compton Wynyates] , and it was thought they intended to go to Warwick castle the next day, but the Lord Brooke had noe notice from the Earle of three dayes warning, as was agreed between them; There was also Colonell Lunsford, and divers Lords too long to name; There was the Lord Wilmot who kept back the town of Atherbury [Adderbury] from coming in to aid Banbury, and threatned he would hang up the men and send the souldiers to their wives and children.

Proceedings at Banbury since the Ordnance went down for the Lord Brooke to fortifie Warwick Castle, 1642, among the King's pamphlets in the British Museum.

The following day Lord Northampton did indeed take the guns to Warwick and laid siege to the town for two weeks, during which one of the guns exploded and nearly killed one of Spencer Compton's sons. The siege of Warwick was hastily abandoned on 22nd August when Lord Brooke arrived with a strong relief force.

BACK TO TOP


A letter from Sir James Compton on the death of his father, to Prince Rupert

The Second Earl was killed at the Battle of Hopton Heath on 19th March 1643, and shortly afterwards his eldest son Sir James wrote the following letter to Prince Rupert to offer his continued support to the King's cause:

Sir,

I thought it my Dutie, affaires standing as they do and I untimely having an unwisht for honour fallen uppon me by ye unfortunate death of my father ye Earle of Northampton, to let your Highness understand how his military commands at this present stands. Hee was raising a regiment of horse, and had allready raised three troupes besides his owne, two of whiche were here [Stafford] present at the battell, the other was sent back from Henley in Arden to Banbury, for ye securitie of that garrison whereof ye Earle of Northampton was governor; his foote regiment, excepting some commanded men, being left there for ye defence of ye towne and Castle. If it shall please his Matie and your Highness to confer these commands whiche were my fathers on mee, none shall bee more willing to do his Matie service (according to my weake abilities). With life and fortune I will not trouble your Highness with ye relation of what hath passed being you will heare by better hands in all particulars, so craving pardon for my boldness in troubling you, I shall alwais remain Your Highness most humble and faithfull servant,

Northampton.

British Library (ref. MSS 18, 980)

A letter from Sir James Compton to his widowed mother on 22nd March 1643

Deare Mother,

On Sunday last we got the day of the Rebels; but our losse (especially your Honours and mine) is not to be expressed, for though it be a generall losse to the Kingdome, yet it toucheth us nearest. But Madam, Casualties in the world will happen, & in such a cause who would not have ventured both life and fortune? Pray'e Madam, let this be your comfort, that it was impossible for any to do braver than he did, as appeares by [the rebels'] owne Relation...His Armour was so good that they could not hurt him till he was downe, and had undone his head-peece. Pray'e Madam, be comforted; and think no man could more honourably have ended this life...to be partaker of heavenly joies. We must certainely follow him, but can hardly hope for so brave a death. Thus humbly craving your blessing, I shall remaine till death your obedient Sonne,

Northampton

BACK TO TOP


A Letter to Prince Rupert following the Earl of Northampton's victory at Middleton Cheney, Saturday 6th May 1643

The Banbury Garrison frequently skirmished with rebel troops from the Northampton garrison. The following letter, written to Prince Rupert, refers to the battle of Middleton Cheney, just two miles to the east of Banbury:

May it please your Highness,

I have received a command from my Lord of Northampton to have waited on your Highness if you were in town, if elsewhere to dispatch one presently to attend your Highness with an account of his yesterday's action; there came towards Banbury from Northampton four troops of horse, six or seven hundred foot, one piece of cannon of six pound bullet, all which came within half a mile of the town of Banbury.

My Lord having only thirteen troops of horse with him, resolved to charge them, in which it hath pleased God that my Lord hath taken three hundred prisoners, killed above a hundred in the place, wounded most of the rest, took the cannon, all the ammunition, as many arms gathered up as four carts could bring, all which is in Banbury; all the foot officers take or slain, but the horse as usually, made haste away, yet many of them came short home: my Lord lost not of all his company above three men, so, humbly taking leave, I rest, Sir

Your Highness's most humble servant.

Philip Willoughby

Oxford 7th May 1643
7 o'clock in the morning

A rebel account claimed that three shots from their drake killed 30 Royalists and unhorsed the young Earl of Northampton. It was also alleged that most of the rebel prisoners were "shrewdly hurt, the young Earl that day sacrificing to the memory of his father". What is certain is that 46 rebels were buried at Middleton Cheney church on Sunday 7th May 1643. In addition the victory persuaded local gentry to supply the Banbury Garrison with two troops of horse and 200 dragoons, just three days later.

BACK TO TOP


An account of a duel near Banbury involving an Officer of the Banbury Garrison on Wednesday July 31st 1644

The following comes from Mercurius Aulicus. A troop of The Earl of Northampton’s horse was set upon by a body of Parliamentarians, and the two troops rather than fight issued a challenge that their leaders should have a duel which would save unnecessary bloodshed.

But though a few at Basing chased such a numerous body of Rebells, yet the Rebels of Northampton will fall to it one by one, and performe a Duell rather than not Rebell. For yesterday 40 of those Rebels Horse (Commanded by one Captaine Clark) brew up betwixt Nethercote and Banbury, and faced the Towne, which caused Lieutenant Middleton (of the Earle of Northampton’s Regiment) to draw out the like number; who facing one another, there presently grew a challenge betwixt the Two Commanders, that their men should stand at distance and they try it out themselves. This being accepted, the Two Commanders encountered one another, but neither of their pistolls taking fire, they fell instantly to the sword, whereat Lieutenant Middleton seemed the better Souldier; which Captaine Clark perceiving, he laboured to get off, and therefore for a farewell flung his Pistoll at the Lieutenant, and rode away: but the Lieutenant pursued, and with his sword ran Clark into the backe, and had brought him off, but that three of Clarks party suddenly came in to his rescue. This wound was pretended by Captaine Clark to be very dangerous, if not mortall; whereupon he sent a Trumpet that afternoone to Banbury, to let them know it was altogether against his will that his men rescued him; affirming, that hee had rather have dyed upon the place by Lieutenant Middletons hand, then thus to suffer in his reputation. So ‘tis a dishonour for the Captaine to be rescued, though it were none to run away.

BACK TO TOP


An account of an attempted assault on the besieged Banbury Garrison by rebel troops on Monday 23rd September 1644

The following is a contemporary Royalist account reproduced in Beesley's The History of Banbury published in 1841. The Banbury Garrison, under the command of Lt Col Anthony Greene and Major William Compton, had been under siege within Banbury Castle since 25th August. Over the next month the rebel besiegers bombarded the castle doing severe damage and causing a major breach but failed to defeat the garrison, who kept sallying out on horseback to attack rebel foot troops. An attempt was made by the rebels to assault the castle on 23rd September:

About 9 of the clocke that morning they began to fall on. Their foote had beene so banged by continuall sallyes that they were not hardy enough for this service; therefore they hired Troopers to lead them on, 12 out of each company, with their best officers. These were to have £300 (as was confest) for their paines. The number of assaylants was about 1000. They came on with burdens of furrs on their backes, which they cast into the Mote the better to passe the mud, and so assaulted it in 5 severall places at once. The greatest number were on that side where the breach was; on all other partes they brought ladders, but the courageous defendants never suffered them to reare so much as one ladder, but cut them off with great and small shot, which was sent among them like haile...

Towards evening that day they [the rebels] sent a trumpet to desire the bodies of their dead, which was granted upon condition that those which had fallen within pistoll shot of the Castle should be stript by those of the garrison and delivered naked in the Market place; which was done accordingly. All Tuesday last [24th September] they spent in solemnizing the burials of their dead with drumms, trumpets, vollies of shot and now and then a Psalme...they were much broken as they expressed at their funeralls, having lost so many of their best officers. Themselves have acknowledged above 300 slaine and wounded...

Only 9 of the Banbury Garrison were lost, and the garrison collected weaponry from 120 bodies, plus the scaling ladders.

BACK TO TOP


An Account of the Relief of the Siege of Banbury Castle, Friday October 25th 1644, by forces under the Earl of Northampton

TUESDAY, Octob. 22nd 1644: This day the Earl of Northampton with a good strength of His Majesties Horse marched from the rendezvous on Redheath neere Newbury, quartering all night at Farnborough, whence

WEDNESDAY, Octob. 23rd: This morning early his Lordship came towards Woodstocke; In his march hee met with a party of Rebells, conveying sixty fat oxen from Faringdon to their friends at Abingdon; these he instantly made stay of, but finding the Rebells to make resistance, he killed 5 of them and took 22 prisoners, whereof some were officers, and left not one man to go tell them at Abingdon, bringing the prisoners with the fat oxen to Cassington, and these he quartered all night –

THURSDAY, Octob. 24th: To day his Lordship marched to Beechen Tree (where the Rendezvous was) to meet with Colonell Gage with some Horse and Foot from Oxford (whos Horse were commanded by Colonell Webb, the Foot by Lieutenant Colonell Gerard and Major Kirke) and accordingly here they joined, and marched to Dedington a village 4 miles from Banbury, where they purposed to have quartered that night. But viewing the advenues of the place for better securing of their men, they found the waters so high, that they could not without much difficulty get over the bridges to Adderbury, where some of the Rebells then lay, who giving notice to Banbury the Rebells might easily have obstructed the passage, and frustrated the whole designe. Hereupon both Horse and Foote marcht farther to Adderbury, whence the Rebells fled as they had done before at Dedington, and thus was the passe over the river gained. Twas full 10 of the clocke before they came into their quarters, and past twelve ere the soldiers could thinke of any repose. Nor did they rest there above 4 howers, For

FRIDAY, Octob. 25th: This morning before five a clocke they drew out from Adderbury, and marched towards Banbury; by seven they were within halfe a mile of the Towne, where they found the Rebels Horse (about 800) in five bodies, drawne up, on the south side of the Towne near their new sconce; here the Rebels stood facing His Majesties Forces a quarter of an houre without attempting anything, till two or three shot made by two small drakes, which Colonell Gage brought from Oxford, made the Rebels stagger, so as they traversed their ground by the Towne on the West side, retreating somewhat disorderly towards Hanwell. The Rebels Foot (about 700) ran confusedly out of Banbury Towne towards their Horse, having sent their Baggage that way with their Artillery in the night before. The Rebels thus retyring, the Earle of Northampton persued after them with three regiments of Horse (the Earle of Brainford’s, the Lord Wilmot’s, and his own) and some Dragooners, Colonell Webb being sent on the lefthand round about Crouch Hill with most part of the Oxford Horse, on purpose to face them or charge them in the flanke. In the meane time Colonell Gage with the Foot entered Banbury, and relieved the Castle with ammunition and provision.

His Lordship made all possible haste to overtake the Rebels, which he did about halfe a mile short of Hanwell, and there (on the top of a hill) a forlorn hope commanded by Captaine Browne (Captaine Lieutenant to the Earle of Northampton) was drawne out to charge the Rebels, who being in larger bodies, the Captaine joyned with Colonell Webb’s Oxford Horse. The Rebels came hastily on, but when they were within pistoll shot, they made a stand, whereupon Colonell Webb, and Captaine Browne withdrew to their maine body, where the noble Earle standing ready, came up instantly and charged so gallantly, that he quickly disordered the Rebels, who fled a good gallop towards Hanwell, their Foote having lyned the hedges neare Hanwell Warren, gave his Lordship two volleyes of shot as he persued (though but one man fell by it) whereby the Rebels Horse had some time to run together. But the gallant Earle followed them so close, that in a field neare Hanwell Towne they all scattered and dispersed themselves; some towards Cropredy (Sir William Waller’s Bridge) others through Hanwell Towne, some towards Broughton and Compton, but the most towards Edge-Hill (whither you’ll sweare they went not willingly) His Lordship all this while doing wholsome execution on them. But nobody either saw or heard of Colonell John Fiennes (fearing that his Horse would not perform the race) cried out for Quarter, Quarter, when nobody had hands on him, or indeed neare him; in which affrightment he fled betimes to their garrison at Compton house, and there he begged admittance, but was refused by young Puresey the Governor (sonne to Gamelliel Puresey) who bid him goe to Banbury Castle; Master Fiennes durst not spend time to reply, but posted away to Warwick, and thence to Coventry, whence he sent letters next morning concerning Prisoners (O who would not pitty the Horse he rode on?) the greatest body of the Rebells being persued towards Edge-Hill received most execution.

Their Foote which was left in the pastures against the Warren, escaped through the enclosures by help of hedges and ditches, for neither the Rebells Horse nor Foote stayd till the Oxford Foote came from Banbury to deal with them. The persuit reached as far as Edge-Hill and in Warmington field (the very same place where the Lord Brooke was made retreat with five pieces of ordnance in August 1642, by Spencer Earle of Northampton). These Rebells now forsooke their Carriages, leaving one field piece of 4” ball, and three waggons loaden with armes and ammunition; which his Lordship brought safe to Banbury Castle. Captaine Browne (a gallant young man) was slaine by the Rebells, Captaine Tilly Captaine Lieutenant to the Lord Generall the Earle of Brainceford was shot in the mouth, by bravely following his Lieutenant Colonell Scroope, who in this action fought like his father (a valiant knight that at Edge-Hill received 19 severall wounds) Colonell Webb had another hurt in his other hand, but he made the Rebells that gave it pay deare for it, Lieutenant Colonell Smyth (who did exceedingly gallantly) had a light hurt, a young gentleman (one Master Boteler) is yet missing, but his body not found and these were all of note either killed or hurt besides 9 common Troopers. As for the Rebells they were so fully dealt with, that from Hanwell to Edge-Hill the way was spread with the Rebells dead bodies, whereof many rich cloathed, with buffe-coates, silver laced and other good rewards for those that persued them: their fine Major Lidcot (had Sir William Farmers pistoll gone off) had troubled us no more, many Officers and Soldiers taken, especially Captaine Unit, and Lieutenant Vernon (who fled from Donnington Castle) besides fourscore and six other prisoners, four Coronets of Horse, and above 200 horses; 6 barrels of powder, good store of match and great shot, many great Grenadoes, and some hand-Grenadoes, with divers shells and other materialls for more………

In the fight (when they were routed in earnest) the Earle of Northampton’s field word was PRINCE CHARLES, the Rebells word was GOOD NEWES, which his Lordship sent them to carry, having stayed for it at Banbury above a quarter of a yeare, for the siege began the 19th of July; All which time the gallant Knight Sir William Compton, Lieutenant Colonell Green, and the rest of the commanders and soldiers did their parts so coragiously, that they never admitted any one parly; though the Rebells played furiously with great shot and Grenadoes, whereby the Castle lodgings were much impaired, though all is in a speedy way to be better than ever. If you aske how the Castle is releeved remember whom we told you tooke 60 fat oxen on Wednesday last, whereunto.

Mercurius Aulicus, printed at Oxford

BACK TO TOP


An account of an attempt to recapture the Compton family home of Compton Wynyates from rebel occupants on 30th January 1645

The Compton's family home of Compton Wynyates in Warwickshire was lost to rebel forces after a 3 day siege in June 1644. It was then occupied by the detested Major George Purefoy and his troops, who systematically terrorised local royalist sympathisers, and even a few parliamentary supporters. At midnight on 29th/30th January 1645 Sir Charles Compton and Sir William Compton led troops on a two-hour night march from Banbury, to attempt to recapture the house. The following graphic report of the assault was penned by Purefoy himself at 9pm later that evening.

This night, about two of the clock, about 1,000 or 1,200 Horse and Foot fell upon me at Compton, storm'd my outworks, gain'd the stables and cut down my great Draw-bridge and possest themselves of all my Troop horses, and took about 30 of my foot Souldiers in their beds who lay over the stables, almost before a man could think what to do. We received that alarm as we had good cause, and presently made good the new Sconce before the stone Bridge & beat them out of the great Court, there being about 200 entred and ready to storm the Sconce. But we gave them so hot a sallie that we forced them to retreat backe to the stables, Barns and Brew-house, where from the windowes they played very hot upon us. I then commanded Lieutenant Purefoy [his brother] & my quarter-master (having no other Officers of quality at home, the rest being abroad with about 30 of my best Troopers) to sally out upon the enemy with a partie of some 40, & to attempt the regaining of the Brew-house and the rooms above, which they did with gallant resolution and courage. Sergeant Bird was one who came not short in bravery of any. This party fought with the enemy and came to push of Pike, nay, to swords point, and did lay about so bravely that they forced the enemy to retreat from chamber to chamber. I then sent out my youngest brother the Ensign with my three corporalls of horse and about 40 more men to relieve the first partie; and I will assure you, the young boy will fight: he led on his men bravely, and relieved his brother, by which meanes all the upper roomes were gained. And the enemy kept onely the stables and barns, stoutly, [but] my resolute souldiers did then thunder their horses and reserves of foot that stood within pistol shot, that Sir William and Sir Charles Compton began to give ground, which my souldiers easily perceiving, some leapt out at the windowe and so into the out-works, by which means I recovered my out-works againe, and made good a sally port, by which the enemy endeavoured to retreat at; but finding they were frustrated of their hopes, and that my Musketeers did play so hot upon the great Draw-bridge that they could not be relieved; & withall having beaten the enemy out of that worke, which we stormd when you took the house, I had time to recover the great Draw-bridge and presently got new ropes and new lockes, and drew it up againe in spight of them all. Now these whose names you have here inclosed were all in Cobbs pound, having no meanes in the world to retreat. Whereupon they fought desperately for the space of 3 houres, & the valiant Comptons perceiving their extreame losse attempted three severall times to storm and to regain my outworkes, but all three times were beaten off with as much resolution and gallantry as could be. The enemy within set fire on the hay, straw and all combustible stuffe, to smother my men out of the upper rooms, which did indeed much annoy them; and the Enemy without threw at least 100 hand Granadoes upon the houses that they set them on fire in divers places. Sir Charles and Sir William Compton then thinking all was their own sent a Trumpeter to parlie, but I commanded that none should parlie, nor would I permit the Trumpeter to speak at all, though faine he would have said something to my souldiers, but commanded him upon his life to be gone and return no more at his perill. We continued in fight still, and the fire did so encrease that I thought it fit to offer quarter to all those in the stable, for their lives onely; but they would not hear me. Upon which I drew all my men together and fell violently in upon them, wherein were slain and taken prisoners all whose names are in the insuing list. This did so dishearten the Comptons and all their forces that they did draw presently off all their foot, and onely faced me with their horse, and sent another Trumpeter to parley. But I commanded to give fire upon him, so that he returned with no other answer but what a Musket could speake. Sir, this is as true and as short a Narration as I can give you. I am, as we all are,

Your obliged servants & kinsmen

George Purefoy

The Banbury Garrison retreated in defeat about 9am, taking back eight cart-loads of dead and wounded with them. According to Purefoy, the Banbury Garrison lost 20 Officers, 40 others dead, plus 40 taken prisoner. A sad day indeed for the Earl of Northampton's Regiment.

BACK TO TOP


A brief account of an attack on a rebel supply convoy by the Earl of Northampton's Regiment, 6th March 1645

The importance of clothing soldiers was so overwhelming that convoys of cloth which ventured onto England's highways were regularly waylaid. On 6th March 1645 a detachment of scouts from Banbury, busy collecting contributions near Ilmington to the west of Banbury, routed a small party of rebels, only to discover that they were the advance party of a much larger contingent escorting a huge convoy of clothing from Gloucester to Warwick. Hastily calling up the main regiment, Northampton's forces then successfully ambushed the convoy of pack-horses as it negotiated the narrow bridge at Halford on the River Stour:

Sixe or seaven of their packs got over the narrow Bridge at Hawford Mill; the other 72 Sir Charles [Compton] and his Souldiers seized, three or foure whereof the Souldiers presently opened, and found to be broad Cloath of 20 shillings a yeard. In those packs which the Souldiers opened were wrapped in the Cloathes Mony, Plate, fine Linnen and rich Apparell...Sir Charles slew 12 Rebels in the place, tooke neare 70 of them Prisoners, and almost six score Horses...

From an original letter penned by a Royalist, reproduced in Beesley's The History of Banbury published in 1841. The Royalists estimated the booty's value at £10,000. Rebel accounts vouchsafe for the accuracy of the Royalist report.

BACK TO TOP


A report of a skirmish at Kingsthorpe near Northampton on Tuesday 18th March 1645, involving the four eldest Compton brothers

Taken from Mercurius Aulicus, the leading Royalist newspaper, written the following day:

The Vapouring Rebell [Major George Purefoy, garrisoning Compton Wynyates] you see talkes lustily, and that's his chiefe strength; for the most noble Earle of Northampton doth so coope him up, that his cummings abroad are more like a thiefe than a souldier, creeping sometimes in the darke, where he steals Contributions to keepe himselfe in heart to pen blustering warrants. Yesterday he durst not peep out, for the Earle of Northampton (with his three brave brothers) was abroad with his horse, having intelligence that the Rebels horse from Northampton, were quartered at Kingsthorpe, two miles beyond Northampton; before his Lordship approached them, they were all got into Northampton, but as he returned he saw 40 horse come out of Northampton, and at his passage neare Althorpe, plainly espied that the Rebels had drawne their whole strength of horse, with Newport-Pagnell horse, and lined the hedges with musketeers; whereupon he faced about, and perceiving their body of foote not neere, but onely those few that lined the hedges, he drew up into foure bodies (the Rebels also were foure) and knowing the former qualities of their horse, drew up as far from the hedges as he could, and then charged them; the Rebels depending much upon the ayde of their foote, not having beene known to stand the dispute so long, which continued above half an hour at the sword; at last the Rebels were all routed and ran; the body charged by Sir William Compton first gave ground and after ran quite away, Sir William pursued execution, whilst his Lordship [Earl James Compton] and Sir Charles Compton gathered up two bodies to be ready to receive the Rebels, in case they should make head again; but they were so slashed and broken that they never look'd back, twenty four of them were kild in the place, whereof two captaines, one of them was Captaine Lydcott, twenty six officers and soldiers taken prisoners, and a very great many sore wounded, among which were Captaine Clark and Captaine Guy; all the pillage of the field taken both horse and foote armes, and about thirty horse. His Lordship had lost but five common souldiers, only the couragious Captaine Colbourn was shot into the body by Captaine Lydcott, who for his paines was shot by cornet Lovel; Captaine Colbourn wee heare will recover, hee was left at Daventry, because a little before at a Mill his Lordship did leave Captaine Guy (one of the Rebels) who charging Sir William Compton was run through by Sir Spencer Compton...Thus fell Guy (not of Warwick) whom this noble young knight exceeded in courage, more than the old Gyant did Captaine Guy in Stature. But the chiefest news of all (whereof all good men will be sensible) is the happy preservation of these foure noble brothers, who in this sharp encounter so farre engaged their persons that every one of them was particularly endangered; the gallant Earle himselfe was so deepe in, that his head-piece was beaten off, his brother Sir Charles Compton had a pistol (not firing) clapt close to his head, Sir William's horse was shot under him, with a thrust upon the edge of his armes, and Sir Spencer enclosed by eight Rebels, beyond all expectation quit himself; So as not one of them received the least hurt, though they charged and rescued one another so often, that if any of the foure had beene absent, some one of them might have fallen, which would have made it an unhappy Victory to us, for if you consider their quality, yeares, loyalty, courage, and diligence, you'll scarcely match these foure brethren in His Majesty's or any other King's Dominions.

BACK TO TOP


An account of a skirmish at Islip near Oxford between Cromwell and the Earl of Northampton, on Thursday 24th April 1645, and the regrouping of the King's forces at Oxford

Both armies spent the winter quarters of 1644/45 regrouping and reorganising their armies. This became a race as the rebels formed the New Model Army in the south-east, out of the broken armies of the Earls of Essex and Manchester and Sir William Waller. The King regrouped his army around Oxford with a plan to head north. Fairfax ordered Cromwell to take 1500 horse to disrupt Royalist preparations, and on 24th April Cromwell arrived at Islip bridge to the north of Oxford, which was controlled by a brigade of cavalry under the Earl of Northampton. This was the first action of the New Model Army:

The marchings and movings and actions of the Royal army, his Majesty being personally present, from his coming out of his winter-quarters at Oxford...

Thursday April 24, 1645. Cromwell's horse and dragoons ruined some of our horse, then quartered about Islip, of the Lord of Northampton's command; 31 buried at Islip; 18 men buried in [Hampton Poyle] , over against Kidlington; and this day they demanded the delivery up of Blechindon, a house belonging to Sir Thomas Coghill, wherein Colonel Windebanke had 200 foot, sans works and provision only for two or three days. This afternoon one of Oxford troops kept the bridge of Gosfard; at night came some commanded foot out of Oxford; whither also Colonel Palmer's regiment of horse.

About two or three of the clock on Friday morning the colonel valiantly gave up the house and all his arms, &c. besides 50 horse that came in thither [from Islip] for shelter, and this without a shot. Friday in the afternoon he was condemned by a council of war to die; and those that were his counsellors and advisers, viz. Lieutenant-Colonel Hutchinson, Major Earnley, Mr Eades, were disabled from ever bearing arms more.

Saturday morning, Wallingford troop came to Oxford, to relieve the Lord of Northampton, &c. Some horse and foot came from Farringdon, from Colonel Lisle's garrison; and all the horse in Oxford were to be drawn out (and many horses were this day plundered upon that pretence). When we had drawn out and marched, news came that the enemy was gone. We returned to our several quarters. At seven of the clock the Queen's troop of life guard was beat up, and 60 horses taken; but six men.

On Sunday the 26th, the enemy pursued Lisle's men, and took and killed near 200 of them. This afternoon also many foot and horse were drawn out of Oxford.

May 4, Prince Rupert and Prince Maurice came to Oxford. General Goring came on Monday.

May 7, his Majesty left Oxford, attended with Prince Rupert, Prince Maurice, the Earl of Lindsey, the Duke of Richmond, and the Earl of Northampton. His troop and the Queen's lay that night at Woodstock.

Thursday, May 8. This morning at one of the clock an alarm waked us; and at day-break the King marched with his four pieces of cannon, eight boats in carriages, &c. viz. all manner of ammunition, his troop of life-guards and foot regiment, the Earl of Northampton's regiment of horse, Sir Thomas Dalison's regiment of horse, and part of the regiment of life-guards in the van; ammunition, &c. next; then his Majesty and the Earl of Northampton in the rear. Near Stow on the Would we joined with Prince Rupert's army of horse and foot. 18 miles. The King quartered at Stow on the Would. This morning General Goring took 40 of Cromwell's horse prisoners and two colonels near Burton; which news saluted us in Woodstock Park. News that Sir Thomas Fairfax was marched with all his body to relieve Taunton.

Account by Mr R Simmonds, a quarter-master in the King's army, reproduced in The History and Antiquities of the County of Leicester, John Nichols (Vol. III Pt. II)

BACK TO TOP

BACK TO ARTICLES